On MovieTome: Whedon makes an offer on Terminator
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

March 19th, 2009

Are we responsible for content filtering at home?

Posted by Christopher Dawson @ 9:46 pm

Categories: Education Technology

Tags: Malware, Content Filtering, Kid, Dans Guardian, Spyware, Adware & Malware, Cyberthreats, Viruses And Worms, Security, Christopher Dawson

I’ve been corresponding with some folks looking at 1:1 solutions for their schools and came across an issue to which I hadn’t given much thought. When kids are at school, they are generally behind a content filter of some sort and can’t access inappropriate websites (at least without some significant effort on their part). However, if we send kids home with a computer, few parents have any sort of content filtering in place on their home networks (or the neighbor’s network with unsecured WiFi).

This begs the question: are we responsible for ensuring that kids can’t access inappropriate sites at any time they are using a school computer? Is it also in our best interest to keep kids out of the nether reaches of the Web since those tend to be sources of malware that we inevitably need to remove?

In my opinion, the latter is a far greater concern than the former. Parents take over responsibility for monitoring their children when they leave the school. At least, that’s the theory. Not only is this often not the case, but kids are sneaky and perception is important. If parents perceive that a 1:1 program is enabling their kids to look up porn, then you have a pretty big problem on your hands.

That being said, anti-malware and anti-virus software are only two parts of the solution to computer security. One reason that we tend to see very few malware infestations in schools is because content filters prevent people from making it to malware-infected sites, whether or not you have gateway anti-malware in place. Failing to filter content at home is just asking for trouble on the desktop and increases the likelihood of introducing malware to a school network.

Unfortunately, most client-side content filters tend to simply block sites from blacklisted URLs. Some are more sophisticated while others can be quite pricey (or both). Dans Guardian is an outstanding free and open source content filter for *nix-based systems, but is complicated to set up and doesn’t work on Windows.

So what’s the solution? Provide the software? Rely on free software with limited capabilities? Switch everyone to Linux and deal with Dans Guardian? Don’t sweat it and let the parents take responsibility? Talk back below and let us know your thoughts.

Christopher Dawson

Follow Chris Dawson on Twitter! Christopher Dawson is the technology director for the Athol-Royalston School District in northern Massachusetts and a member of the Internet Press Guild. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations, but always keep in mind that the opinions expressed here are his own and not those of his daytime employer, even if he talks incessantly about his day job.

Email Christopher Dawson

Subscribe to ZDNet Education via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 23 Talkback(s)
Some software suggestions for the malware prevention part of your question
If you are primarily concerned with the malware prevention aspect then a few suggestions: (And no, I don't have any connection with the companies/products mentioned-I am a librarian responsible for ke... (Read the rest)
Posted by: lweight@... Posted on: 03/23/09  (Edited: 03/23/09 @ 02:15) You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Why?  voyager529 | 03/19/09
Exactly, even my university doesn't allow this  T1Oracle | 03/20/09
Personally, I don't bother with content filtering  Lerianis | 03/19/09
RE: Are we responsible for content filtering at home?  ctcjim@... | 03/19/09
RE: Are we responsible for content filtering at home?  sonya_deanna@... | 03/19/09
Squid and OpenDNS  rathishg | 03/19/09
RE: Are we responsible for content filtering at home?  scouser73 | 03/20/09
An Idea  jfp | 03/20/09
RE: Are we responsible for content filtering at home?  dysart | 03/20/09
I hate to say it:  rshores | 03/20/09
The schools are responsible for their networks...  John L. Ries | 03/20/09
RE: Are we responsible for content filtering at home?  Linux User 147560 | 03/20/09
no, the parents are and must be made aware of this  lostarchitect | 03/20/09
of course we're responsible  coffeeshark | 03/20/09
And What If....  mikefarinha | 03/20/09
like you said  coffeeshark | 03/20/09
It's INCREDIBLY easy.  TripleII | 03/20/09
RE: Are we responsible for content filtering at home?  dhensley@... | 03/20/09
Parents need help!  hnoyes | 03/20/09
RE: Are we responsible for content filtering at home?  Zippereye125 | 03/20/09
RE: Are we responsible for content filtering at home?  piperdown | 03/21/09
RE: Are we responsible for content filtering at home?  dbaun@... | 03/23/09
Some software suggestions for the malware prevention part of your question  lweight@... | 03/23/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here