On The Insider: Cougar Town Production Postponed
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

May 29th, 2009

Banning Scientology doesn't make Wikipedia more credible

Posted by Christopher Dawson @ 1:09 pm

Categories: Education Technology

Tags: Scientology, Wikipedia, Wiki, Online Communications, Christopher Dawson

So Wikipedia has banned all Church of Scientology IP addresses “in an unprecedented effort to crack down on self-serving edits,” according to the Register and several other outlets. So what’s with the title from one of the rare educators who actually thinks Wikipedia has a lot of value?

I’m not unhappy that Wikipedia bans self-serving edits or those that aren’t neutral or informational in nature. That’s not a problem and a completely reasonable policy. My problem is that all the policies in the world, or, as the Register calls them, Wikipowersthatbe can’t catch all of the junk that makes its way onto Wikipedia.

Never one to throw the baby out with the bath water, though, most of us will acknowledge that Wikipedia contains a lot of well-sourced, well-written information. This is where we as educators come in. Wikipedia is like a microcosm of the web: huge amounts of highly usable information that our students must extract from a lot of worthless junk.

Our students, whether they are Googling, Bing-ing (just doesn’t have the same ring, does it?), or digging through Wikipedia should be able to identify sources of limited credibility. This isn’t just a web skill, either. It’s a matter of critical thought. Is there bias in a source? How much of a source is news and how much is personal spin? Even I quoted the Register, above; the Reg is quite newsy but puts a biting, sarcastic spin on just about everything within its pages. This doesn’t make it invalid, but how skilled are our students at sorting out even satire or sarcasm from a source?

Wikipedia has plenty of credibility with or without Scientology editors. It’s simply our students who have to learn that anything they see online should be taken with a grain of salt.

Christopher Dawson

Follow Chris Dawson on Twitter! Christopher Dawson is the technology director for the Athol-Royalston School District in northern Massachusetts and a member of the Internet Press Guild. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations, but always keep in mind that the opinions expressed here are his own and not those of his daytime employer, even if he talks incessantly about his day job.

Email Christopher Dawson

Subscribe to ZDNet Education via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 40 Talkback(s)
Anti-Scientology is also a cult in itself.
There's a clique of anti-Scientology bullies hovering over all the Scientology articles and trying to make them all as negative as possible. These people are as just as much an obnoxious cult.
... (Read the rest)
Posted by: reppybep Posted on: 09/03/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Sorry Chris... an effort to do something is better than no effort. (nt)  croberts | 05/29/09
Plus 1  pjotr123 | 05/29/09
2  boombaard | 05/29/09
No, but it sure makes the Thetans angry.  osreinstall | 05/29/09
A Thetan ate my dog...  BillDem | 06/01/09
Better than your wallet.  osreinstall | 06/01/09
Scientology - shrug  nizuse | 05/29/09
RE: Banning Scientology doesn't make Wikipedia more credible  rackinroll | 05/29/09
Hard to avoid biased info  John L. Ries | 05/30/09
Seriously? You know of an unbiased source?  ajole | 05/30/09
RE: Banning Scientology doesn't make Wikipedia more credible  captbilly | 05/29/09
Credibility is not the point  lisamcpherson2008@... | 05/29/09
Wikipedia never had credibility . . .  CobraA1 | 05/29/09
Science  sboverie@... | 06/01/09
Wikipedia also banned obsessed Anti-Scientologists...  archetuthus | 05/29/09
Was it supposed to?  DWDavis | 05/29/09
Wikipedia and Credibility?  Cosmo54 | 05/29/09
Banning Scientology doesn't make Wikipedia more credible  kozmcrae | 05/29/09
Wikipedia and climatology: censorship  nizuse | 05/29/09
Surely there's a better way!  Zogg | 05/29/09
If Wikipedia is banning religions...  Cosmo54 | 05/30/09
Because often science comes too darn close  zmud | 05/30/09
lol - you want to believe that  nizuse | 05/30/09
A simple minded assessment  T1Oracle | 05/30/09
Hmmm  nizuse | 05/31/09
LRON is your bff now  snafu_77 | 05/30/09
RE: Banning Scientology doesn't make Wikipedia more credible  colcrys@... | 05/30/09
A good start would be for you to have  frgough | 05/30/09
I bet you pour mercury into the river for fun  T1Oracle | 05/30/09
RE: Wikipedia not credible?  zdneter0000 | 05/30/09
Your missing the point.  jdbukis@... | 05/31/09
I suppose the "People's Republic of (fill in the blank) .....  kd5auq | 05/30/09
But, When should the line be drawn?  BlazingEagle | 05/31/09
RE: Banning anything  ca1ic0cat | 06/01/09
YOU AREN'T AN EDUCATOR  Spiritusindomit@... | 06/01/09
RE: Banning Scientology doesn't make Wikipedia more credible  jerrywaller | 06/01/09
RE: Banning Scientology doesn't make Wikipedia more credible  marcel@... | 06/01/09
RE: Banning Scientology doesn't make Wikipedia more credible  shadfurman | 06/01/09
RE: Banning Scientology doesn't make Wikipedia more credible  dfumagalli@... | 06/02/09
Anti-Scientology is also a cult in itself.  reppybep | 09/03/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Meet Doc